C.R.A.Z.Y. (2005)

With its loud dayglo poster and hopelessly retro-hip trailer, C.R.A.Z.Y. appears to be marketed (at least in Singapore) as a hilarious, hip teen flick about coming out of the closet… which had me half-expecting one of those gross-out comedies the Americans seem to love so much. I just figured the Canadians were about to get in on the act. Of course, I should have been sufficiently clued in by the numerous accolades and critical plaudits this movie has won to realise that it was no mere mainstream hit, though it certainly has crossover potential given the gripping universality of its themes. Thank heaven that C.R.A.Z.Y., despite its trappings as a dime-a-dozen family drama about a young male protagonist’s coming of age, actually breaks out of every marketing and genre mould you’d expect it to occupy, to create a fresh, touching and very real exploration of all the pain and joy associated with family, growing up, and wanting – nay, needing – to be loved.

Zachary Beaulieu (played by Marc-Andre Grondin when a teenager/adult and by Emile Vallee as a child) is the fourth boy in a set of five sons, literally marked as different from his brothers by a scar – caused when he was dropped on his head the very Christmas day he was born in 1960 – and a stray lock of blonde hair at the nape of his neck that has never matched the rest of his dark hair. Each of his brothers have their own distinctive personalities, of course – Christian (Maxime Tremblay) is a bookworm who reads so voraciously even food labels don’t escape his hungry eyes; Raymond (Pierre-Luc Brillant) a drugged-out loser of a hippie who nevertheless emanates cool; Antoine (Alex Gravel) a jock whose life revolves around sports; and youngest son Yvan (Felix-Antoine Despatie) whose sole distinguishing characteristic unfortunately appears to be that he’s chubby. But there is something different about Zac – not because he has miraculous healing powers imparted to him by the Christ-child whose birthday he shares, as his loving, quietly devoted and spiritual mother Laurianne (Danielle Proulx) wants to believe, but because Zac is gay (or at least bisexual). As he struggles for years to find and define himself as a human being, Zac battles his own disgust and horror at what he hopes he will not become, praying to an apparently unhearing, uncaring god to fix what he thinks is wrong with him. But even harder to handle than his own self-recrimination, Zac discovers, is the dark, bitter disappointment and denial of his beloved father Gervais (Michel Cote) that fundamentally and painfully redefines their relationship when the latter’s suspicions about his son’s sexual orientation solidify and start to colour his perception of Zac for the worse.

For the most part, C.R.A.Z.Y. is a wonderful movie-watching experience – it’s engaging, funny, thoroughly involving… and unless you’ve grown up a hermit and have no familial relationships whatsoever, it’s also the kind of movie that strikes a chord with just about anyone anywhere. Who hasn’t felt, however fleetingly, that miserable feeling of alienation from the people you love the most, and most crucially, the people you expect to accept you and love you conditionally? The snapshots of a life provided by Zac’s wry, quirky voice-over as he recounts seminal moments in his childhood are achingly familiar – and perhaps become most clear when he introduces each of his brothers with the knowing, weary frustration that comes from loving and hating them in equal measure, particularly his “mortal enemy” Raymond. That’s just how sibling relationships are – the love is there, but it’s buried beneath a layer of annoyance, frustration and what feels a lot like hate, frequently more immediate and certainly manifesting itself more obviously than its opposite. In this sense, the movie excels, because Zac’s relationships with the key members of his family – namely his parents and Raymond – are painstakingly drawn, and coloured in with so many shades of grey that their relationships and motivations are always shifting and never predictable. In other words, they’re – crucially – very much as you’d expect real people to be.

Standouts, of course, are not coincidentally also the stars of the show. Zac is front and centre, and is certainly a fascinating study of a young man not just dealing with growing up and its attendant hormonally-induced turmoil, but also struggling to understand his own feelings and sexuality. Thankfully, the scenes illustrating this internal conflict are usually subtly handled – ranging from the painfully funny (Zac’s star-spangled rendition of a David Bowie song gets him a walloping from the macho Antoine and the bemused giggles of a gaggle of amused schoolmates outside his window) to the viscerally shocking (as Zac mercilessly pounds into the pavement the one boy at school who recognises and understands what Zac is going through) and the frustratingly, miserably sad (Zac projecting his feelings of lust for his cousin’s boyfriend onto his cousin, in the misguided belief that incestuous feelings are at least a notch above homosexual ones). As Zac spirals through denial after denial, until he almost convinces himself that he was just suffering through a phase, his own actions (getting into a horrific car accident, shouting abuse at the same boy he beat up) only play as a reflection of the same feelings of revulsion and horror that plague his father.

Which leads me to the wonderfully-drawn secondary characters in this piece, who I feel actually were the stars of the movie. Much as it belongs to Zac and his journey, it’s also his father, mother and arch enemy of a brother that lend such emotional resonance to Zac’s travails. Gervais, in particular, is perhaps one of the best minor roles in recent memory – tough, loving, bossy and a know-it-all, the audience watches with Zac as Gervais morphs from the world’s best dad, when they go on special just-them outings for french fries, to a paranoid, untrusting homophobe who seems better able to accept a druggie stoner for a son than a gay. The pride Gervais takes in Zac’s manly exploits – beating up a kid in school, for instance – is funny in the context of the movie, but a great, revealing character moment too. Even in the face of his wife’s far less belligerent attitude towards Zac’s possible sexual proclivities, Gervais remains adamant that he can fix what he thinks is wrong with his son, sending him for therapy or shouting him down in a rained-out carpark on the night of Christian’s wedding. In a moment of particularly hard-won, tortured epiphany, Gervais finally sits his son down and explains to him just why he can’t get over Zac being different in this particular way – and it’s a moment shot through with so much pain and love that it becomes difficult to begrudge Gervais his longstanding refusal to give up on his son perhaps becoming ‘normal’.

Meanwhile, although given less screen-time and dialogue, Zac’s mother Laurianne is as strong a presence in the boy’s life – this stemming very much from her undeniable unconditional love for him, as she indulges the young boy’s desire to push his baby brother’s pram once out of sight of Gervais and the eye he always keeps open for any hint of girliness in his son such that it can be immediately quashed. Laurianne’s quiet faith and devotion to her god and her children are never articulated, but come through strongly – from her reaction to Zac’s gift to her of a book on Jerusalem, or the thudding sound from the kitchen that for her takes the place of heaving sobs as she irons bread for Raymond the way he likes it.

Raymond, as Zac’s dramatic counter-point, is another great character – lurking always on the peripheries of his brother’s subconscious, Raymond is the brother Zac can neither understand not accept, because surely what Raymond does is worse than what Zac only thinks about. As both brothers squabble, picking up on where the other is most sensitive to criticism (Raymond never fails to belittle Zac as a fag, above and beyond the casual use of slang), what’s surprising is that love which still underlies their prickly, hate-filled relationship. Raymond fights for his brother’s honour at Christian’s wedding, or Zac secretly sends Raymond the money he refuses to personally give the latter. And tellingly, at one of the lowest points of Zac’s life, the hallucinated person he first sees that gives him back his life is Raymond – something that becomes true, in a devastatingly literal way, nearer the end of the film.

Not to say that C.R.A.Z.Y. is perfect – not quite. Tonally, it’s a bit of a mess, and I have to admit that I far prefer the quirky charm of the first part, as we watch young Zac grow up and deal first with childhood neuroses like bed-wetting, and then far more serious grown-up problems of anger (breaking his father’s beloved Patsy Cline record), resentment and denial. The feel of this section of the film recalls the offbeat appeal of Amelie, radiating as it does the rose-glow of childhood as Zac complains about sharing the Christ-child’s birthday or gets taken to the local medium/healer Madame Chose (Helene Gregoire) so that she can tell if he shares her gift. It’s also peppered through with gorgeous imagery – Zac hanging blissfully out of his dad’s car window as they take a winding trip down a meandering country road, Zac getting dunked at camp as his mom’s cross disappears into the blue nowhere.

The slow disappearance of Zac’s voice-over heralds a shift into far more gritty, close-to-the-bone dramatic territory, as he grows up and his world becomes a consequently far darker, far gloomier place. The movie’s appeal is considerably reduced when it becomes a series of increasingly depressing scenes which certainly add to the story (and the already hefty two-hour-plus running time), but unfortunately fail to elevate it beyond what had already been established story-wise (Gervais does not want a gay son, basically). Even the flights of fantasy to which Zac is prone become more disturbing in the darker half of the film, which certainly befits its more serious tone – but because the movie almost becomes a documentary in terms of how grave it gets the more running time is clocked up, these more macabre jaunts of imagination (Zac dragging his way across a hot, parched stretch of desert) are jarring rather than organic to the movie and its main character.

Nevertheless, C.R.A.Z.Y. is one of the better coming-of-age stories to have emerged in recent years. Fortunately, writer-director Jean-Marc Vallee clearly wanted to create a true coming-of-age movie rather than a titillating one just about coming out of the closet – and it’s a far richer, more engaging experience because of that. Smart, tender and painfully real, the movie boasts a cracking cast (all are great, but my favourites include the precocious young Vallee, the gruff Cote and the winsome Proulx) and heaps of touching, truthful insight into the ways families can pull together just as easily as they can tear themselves apart.

Pirates Of The Caribbean: Curse Of The Black Pearl (2003)

If you’re looking for the quintessential summer blockbuster, you really don’t need to look any further than Pirates of the Caribbean: Curse of the Black Pearl. Honestly, no one would have thought before actually watching this movie that it’d amount to anything much – based as it is on one of Disney’s most beloved and also most desperately cheesy theme park rides. Hello, it was based on a water ride, people. And it starred t(w)een magnets Orlando Bloom and Keira Knightley. And presumably it was about pirates stealing treasure and swashing their collective buckles as maidens with heaving bosoms swooned in the background – in the grand tradition of Hollywood cliché and Errol Flynn movies. Well, not quite. Confronting head-on the formidable odds against their movie being anything much more than a cheese-fest that’s so bad it’s good, director Gore Verbinski and screenwriters Ted Elliott and Terry Rossio somehow created a modern classic of its genre, mixing action, romance, humour and a lot of sly, witty heart to such wonderful effect it’s hard to imagine how the planned sequels can hope to match the alchemy that went into creating the original’s glossy, charming magic.

The gamine Keira Knightley plays posh governor’s daughter Elizabeth Swann, whose demure appearance and corseted finery cannot hide an adventurous spirit intrigued by the very pirates her father (Jonathan Pryce) and relentlessly stuffy suitor Commander Norrington (Jack Davenport) are bent on eradicating from the seas surrounding their coastal town. Will Turner (Orlando Bloom), meanwhile, is a humble blacksmith who’s nursed a devotion to Elizabeth from the day her ship rescues him, half-drowned, from the choppy black sea – although he loses a precious clue to his birthright when Elizabeth takes (and keeps) the pirate medallion draped around his neck to keep him from being thrown back overboard. Little does Elizabeth know that a band of angry, bloodthirsty pirates led by the captain of the mysterious Black Pearl, the bitter, menacing Barbossa (Geoffrey Rush), are about to descend upon her town and take back that last piece of pirate gold that still hangs around Elizabeth’s neck. When Elizabeth is abducted by said accursed cutthroats, can Will save her? More importantly, how will the perpetually loopy, blithely eccentric Jack Sparrow (Johnny Depp), to all intents and appearances one of the most rubbish pirates ever, help or hinder Will’s rescue efforts… especially when Jack seems to have a longstanding, complicated relationship with Barbossa and more a than a few surprising secrets up his sleeve?

As I’ve already said, movies as thoroughly entertaining as POTC are pretty much one in a million (okay, maybe a few hundred). We should therefore first thank the movie deities for the fact that POTC is blessed with a truly cracking plot – as the story unfolds with all its attendant quirks and revelations about each character’s motivations, you realise that the movie is as intricately-plotted as blockbusters get. The puzzle pieces fit and the world created is a coherent one, though you might not think so at first – even Jack’s triumphant escape from being marooned on a godforsaken island is given its due explanation, when he unwittingly (and very amusingly) winds up there again, this time in the company of a furious Elizabeth. More seriously, when the audience – together with Elizabeth – is confronted with the truth behind Barbossa’s undying search for Will’s medallion, it’s as shocking a revelation as you can hope for, and one that lends the movie a welcome darker undertone that grounds many of its characters, Barbossa included, in an emotional pain that prevents them from tipping over the line into caricature. It’s this very fine line navigated by the writers between humour and chilling, gothic horror that gives POTC its uniquely wry, surprisingly mature voice.

Of course, it also helps that the movie is backed by a script that’s delightfully self-aware and cheerfully tongue-in-cheek. One of the funniest moments in the film comes from Will’s mimickry of Jack’s worryingly wacky behaviour in an attempt to find out if there was a reason for Jack’s apparent lack of sanity… only to be told by a completely straight-faced, earnest Mr Gibbs (Kevin McNally) the wildest, most unbelievable tale of how Jack purportedly escaped from the desert island with the help of a couple of sea turtles and human hair. (Yes, thoroughly random, but that’s what makes it so damn funny.)

Despite its American pedigree, POTC boasts a distinctly British brand of absurdist humour, perhaps best encapsulated in a farcical scene chronicling Jack’s attempt to commandeer a ship. It’s hard to keep a straight face when Norrington’s initial pronouncement of Jack as possibly the worst pirate he’s ever seen is completely reversed by another bemused onlooker, after a typically brilliant move that one never knows for sure was actually intended by Jack allows him to steal the navy’s fastest ship. Such moments of cheeky humour are liberally sprinkled throughout the film, and given deliciously insouciant readings by its enthusiastic cast. Even lines like “We named the monkey Jack” and “Welcome to the Caribbean, love”, for instance, while not funny in and of themselves, are rendered hilarious by Rush and Depp’s respective note-perfect deliveries of said dialogue. (And honestly, once you’ve seen this movie, reading IMDB’s POTC quotes list would be more than enough to set you off again – all exchanges involving the world ‘parlay’ being particularly amusing to me at this point.)

As if a superlative plot and script weren’t sufficient, POTC drew together an eclectic cast that, in retrospect, represented every kind of serendipity there is in the world of Hollywood casting. Granted, Knightley and Bloom struggle to make their presences felt in the shadow of Depp and Rush, but even the two young’uns turn in reasonably spunky, amusing performances – Knightley is moviedom’s new go-to girl for feisty femininity, and nowhere does she prove that more than with Elizabeth, an action heroine just waiting to bust out of her corset. Lacking Depp’s sceen magnetism, Bloom has always been more effective as a second (or third, or fourth) banana, rather than shouldering the film himself. Fortunately, he has Depp to do that for him, and his performance as Will is as blandly, inoffensively charming as he can make it.

The real props when it comes to acting, of course, go to Depp and Rush, both of whom I’m firmly convinced are legends in the making. For once, the Oscars got it so, so right in nominating Depp for 2003’s Best Actor trophy, simply because his turn as Jack, the perpetually half-drunk ragamuffin of a rock-star pirate, surely ranks as one of the most memorable, charismatic performances ever committed to film. If the material he had been working with hadn’t already been good, Depp would have elevated it, so powerful is his interpretation and commitment to a character that was by all accounts not present in this way on the page. His ballsy, in-your-face performance is so integral a part of the movie that you couldn’t imagine POTC being anywhere near as successful, funny and just plain entertaining without it. As a character, Jack is alternately arrogant, infuriating, constantly high and a bit of a bastard – and yet, remains the funny, irreverent backbone of a movie that knows how to not take itself too seriously, and is thus all the better for it. It’s one of those roles that no other actor could have breathed life into – as Depp lolls across the screen, gap-toothed grin flashing from a dirt-encrusted face framed by shaggy dreadlocks, you can practically feel women across the world recalibrating their previous standards of beauty to include this gangling man, who acts very much a churl but hides beneath his bluster the noble spine of a pirate as yet unfelled by encroaching civilisation – a law onto himself.

Less lauded but equally worthy of praise is Rush, who’s clearly having the time of his life spouting out line after catty, bitchy line of dialogue. Just as Jack is one of the best anti-heroes ever created in film, Barbossa is a milestone in villainy. He is equal parts arrogant bluster and genuine menace, as blissfully stupid as comedy villains have to be, and yet as frighteningly creepy as the best bad guys in movie history. Aided by some pretty spectacular special effects, one of Barbossa’s best scenes occurs when he steps into the moonlight and advances toward a suitably horrified Elizabeth – it’s not even really Rush you see in that scene, just his voice and eyes as he warns her to “best start believing in ghost stories” because she’s in one, but even then the scene remains chilling and thrilling in equal measure.

My only complaint about POTC is that it weathers subsequent viewings less well. I saw this movie recently again in preparation for the upcoming sequel, and found that I enjoyed it less (though not by much) than I did when it first came out in 2003. So much of the thrill of watching the movie when it first came out was that you never knew what was coming, because it was just that kind of rousing, thoroughly engaging movie-watching experience. The kind that doesn’t repeat itself, more’s the pity. Nevertheless, POTC remains a rollicking ride that never fails to engage, teeming with excellent dialogue and funny moments, boosted by excellent production values and special effects. (The seabed walk of Barbossa’s pirates is jaw-dropping in its fluidity and eerie beauty). And you can’t ever go wrong if you watch this movie for either Depp or Rush’s performance. Here’s hoping the sequels manage to struggle out from under the looming shadow of their predecessor – although somehow, I have a feeling they’ll have a mighty tough time doing just that.

Cars (2006)

cars

As an unabashed Pixar devotee (many of the movies the studio has churned out over the years rate among my absolute favourite movies), I suppose it’s a shame and a bit of a sacrilege to admit that I was dreading watching Cars. Compared to the snappily intelligent, gut-bustingly hilarious teasers promoting Pixar’s last multiplex-busting effort The Incredibles, the trailers for Cars have been lacklustre in the extreme and – dare I say – frustratingly unfunny. A hot-shot race car gets brought down to earth by his unexpected detour through a sleepy American small town, where his encounters with the local hillbillies cause him to rediscover his roots and his humility? Argh, ugh and oh dear. The trailer made the movie sound and look like a preachy morality tale – shots of the eponymous cars falling in love as they take a slow drive through beautiful countryside (I mean, ew, how obvious and pedestrian can you get?), and the cheesy tagline promoting life as the journey you take rather than the destination you reach certainly didn’t help matters. So I admit to entering the cinema with a great deal of trepidation, hoping against hope that Pixar would pull another slam dunk out of its hat and surprise me. Thankfully, I was surprised, and in a good way. While never really matching Pixar’s best work, Cars fortunately is in every way a Pixar thoroughbred.

But more on this later. First, a brief synopsis: meet hotshot Lightning McQueen (voiced by Owen Wilson), who’s surely the smirkiest animated race car in history. Still just a rookie and lacking even basic accoutrements like headlights, Lightning is nevertheless the new, electrifying presence on the prestigious Piston Cup race circuit. Flashy and arrogant as they come, all Lightning wants is to beat his two greatest rivals – classy long-time champion The King (Richard Petty) and obnoxious perennial runner-up Chick Hicks (Michael Keaton) – at a face-off in California in a week’s time. Unfortunately, en route to California on the interstate, he gets rudely separated from his minder Mack (John Ratzenberger), and trundles into Radiator Springs, a tiny, forgotten town just off the increasingly infrequently used Route 66 whose inhabitants are as weathered and beaten down by time as their surroundings. Trapped into fixing a road he broke (almost literally), Lightning at first reviles then comes to accept and understand the motley crew of townsfolk he encounters, including surprising sophisticate Sally (Bonnie Hunt); mysteriously gruff Doc Hudson (Paul Newman); relentlessly upbeat idiot savant Mater (Larry the Cable Guy) and Ferrari-obsessed tiresmiths Luigi (Tony Shalhoub) and Guido (Guido Quaroni). When what he thought would be the longest week in his life draws far too quickly to a close, can Lightning leave behind this little ghost town that has long been left behind by progress?

Sounds hokey as heck, doesn’t it? And, in a way, Cars is every bit as predictable and cheesy as it appears to be in the trailer. The story doesn’t even try for twists, laying out for Lightning in meticulously obvious detail the path that must be taken by all wayward snobs in movies about self-discovery. Although director John Lasseter thankfully keeps to the Pixar tradition in not making the blatant pop-culture in-jokes that pepper other lesser animated movies, he does resort to rather a lot more cliché than you’d find in Cars‘ predecessors in the Pixar stable. Doc is the quintessential reluctant mentor who sees in young upstart Lightning the secrets and pain of his own past, while Mater – delightfully loopy Mater – is that tenuous connection to humanity Lightning at first can’t wait to shake off but which he slowly realises is a lifeline keeping him from falling prey to his own ambition. Throw in the requisite sassy love interest for our slick little anti-hero, a slew of supposedly inspiring, quirky minor characters who maintain a simple faith in life despite all the setbacks they’ve suffered, slow-mo drives through the countryside in which Lightning readjusts his previously fast-paced priorities… Yup, all that cheese is in there and more.

But – all credit to Pixar for creating some moonshine out of so much pablum – Lasseter somehow polishes up all this old hat up, and makes a surprisingly sweet, touching little cinematic patchwork out of these oh-so-predictable moments. Sure, the storytelling team behind Cars never hits the breathtakingly inventive heights of Toy Story or The Incredibles with its plot, but – crucially – seems to know this and doesn’t care. To my mind, at least, the movie is meant to be a little creaky, a little old-fashioned and predictable. It’s supposed to feel comfortable and familiar, like a movie you’ve watched a hundred times before, as you immerse yourself in nostalgia for an America long lost in the dust of the desert and bypassed by modern roads. Clearly, the road trip Lasseter took his team on before they started the movie yielded some pretty tangible benefits: you can tell just how much love and care went into recreating Radiator Springs’ achingly photo-realistic environs. When Sally explains her apparently inexplicable attachment to a little hick town, she says she fell in love – and the sheer majestic beauty of the panorama revealed to both Lightning and the audience is enough to make you believe every word she says.

All the more amazing, of course, for it having been animated or drawn – and in this regard at least, Cars is another coup for Pixar, which has moved on from toys to fish to people and now conquers the realm of re-imagining cars to somehow make them convey as much, if not more, emotion than you’d imagine would be possible from a bunch of coloured pixels. Thank heavens for Pixar’s design team – each character is more incredibly expressive than the next, moving from guilt to embarrassment to anger with a twist of their fenders and a blink of their windows. Standouts are the irrepressibly emotional Lightning, who’s at once smirky, snobbish and innocent; gangly, rusting Mater, clunky but just about held together with so much cheerful will power; and the reticent little worker-bee Guido. Once you immerse yourself into this movie’s reality, the artwork and animation is so professional that you very quickly take for granted the visual treat you’re experiencing, and give yourself over to the story… which I suspect is what Pixar has always wanted out of its movies. The animation is meant to serve the story, rather than the other way around (Final Fantasy, anyone?) and although here the story is not as compelling or original as in Pixar’s previous outings, the studio’s big, big heart – it’s right there on this movie’s sleeve – remains intact.

Another saving grace for Cars is the trademark wry humour that suffuses much of the movie – there aren’t that many quotable quotes that will stick with you after you leave the cinema, but that’s largely because a great deal of the humour is character-driven… which also partly explains why the movie, despite being set in the high-speed world of race-car driving, initially moves at an almost languid pace as it builds and develops character and story to form a solid bedrock for the gentle, surprising laughs that are teased out of the audience thereafter. Of course, what’s an animated movie without a memorable sidekick and a couple of stupidly but howlingly funny scenes? Mater, for his part, is one of the best comic sidekicks created in recent history – silly, irreverent and a bit of a doofus, yet earnest, faithful and true. He could have been twenty kinds of annoying; instead, he becomes the movie’s kooky emotional fulcrum, and thereby indirectly grounds the far flightier, less sympathetic Lightning in the audience’s affections. And of course, if you’ve seen the movie, you’ll know what I mean when I say the tractor-tipping scene is hilarious – a pretty cheap shot, as jokes go, but deeply amusing for all that.

You wouldn’t think so to look at it, given its seriously glossy, kid-friendly and thoroughly merchandise-ready vehicular stars, but Cars is actually Pixar’s most grown-up movie. It’s an elegy and a tribute to days long gone by, a story about redemption and finding yourself and all that other inspirational hooey you’d have to be, you know, grown up to enjoy. Be warned that your kids might get fidgety at points, and so might you – but it’s the kind of movie in which you have to invest a certain amount of patience and attention before you get your reward. And if you do give yourself over to the movie’s knowingly familiar, happily old-school charms, ten to one you’ll find by the end that you’d been completely won over but had no idea just when it happened. Not an instant classic like some of its more famous stable-mates, Cars nevertheless boasts enough of that magical Pixar sheen to retain a charm and appeal all of its own.

stars-07

The Lord Of The Rings trilogy

lordoftherings

Now I’m definitely not the first, and certainly won’t be the last, person to have an all-day marathon viewing of the full, extended versions of each of the movies in Peter Jackson’s magnificent Lord of the Rings (LOTR) trilogy. And I’m very far from being the only person who can still get completely swept up by the movie magic worked by Jackson in every frame of this 12-hour epic tale, even though I’ve seen each movie at least three times before. (Which nevertheless means I’m nowhere near some of the LOTR devotees who’ve probably clocked a hundred viewings of each film or something.) After all, with each movie, Jackson does something that surprisingly few filmmakers do: he creates a palpably real world, peopled with engaging, living characters, and yet stitches an element of the fantastic – magic, some would call it – into every second. So it’s at once a story and a set of people we can all identify with and find ourselves in, as well as a completely imaginary universe we want to lose ourselves in for a few hours to escape from harsh, harsh reality. Quite aside from these lofty virtues, however, the LOTR movies still manage to perfectly fit the definition of a quality blockbuster popcorn movie: endlessly entertaining, engaging, and hey, check out all those epic battle scenes!

It’s easy to wax lyrical about everything involved with this trilogy, from Jackson’s deep, deep love for the material, which comes through so clearly you feel kind of ashamed for not loving Tolkien’s books quite as much as he evidently does. (Maybe that’s just me?) That Jackson works within the limits and parameters laid down by Tolkien’s work, yet is willing to break the rules for the sake of creating a full, self-sufficient movie-verse (his changes to storyline, including more screen time for Liv Tyler’s Arwen, or the way in which Christopher Lee’s Saruman meets his end, have been controversial but, I feel, successful) makes the product even more astounding. The sheer amount of work, dedication and care that went into the production–exhaustively detailed in the DVD extras, from creating sets and costumes, computer effects, training the actors in swordfighting and Elvish–is something to be marvelled at as well. In a Hollywood where the big honchos prefer movies to be turned out fast and cheap, it’s a rare, rarified air we’re getting to breathe when treated to Jackson’s Middle Earth. It’s a painfully, beautifully detailed visual feast, with some of the most stirring, lovely scoring and musical accompaniment a movie has ever enjoyed.

And its cast! None of them big names, none of them inordinately famous pre-LOTR. And yet, each member of the cast, for better or worse, now has a ticket into movie legend. The entire cast is surprisingly, thankfully perfect for their roles, but standouts for me include Sean Astin as the loyal, steadfast Samwise Gamgee (he’ll never get another role like this), Ian McKellen as the twinkly, wise Gandalf (no other actor could have made Gandalf quite as central a figure as McKellen did with just a wink and a grin) and Viggo Mortensen as the man so charming in spite of himself that his kingliness is taken for granted. That very very few of these actors, excepting Orlando Bloom and Cate Blanchett (the latter of whom was already well on her way up through the movie stratosphere), have had much success with their subsequent films, suggests that the movie’s alchemy touched them just as much as it has us: it’s a once-in-a-lifetime thing.

So when people say that this is the Star Wars for a new generation? They’re not kidding. These are movies that capture heart and mind and soul whatever age you are: you remember the first time you saw those etched, old-school credits flashing up as elf-queen Galadriel (Blanchett) begins to unfold for us the story of Middle Earth’s last, great battle between good and evil. You just can’t help it: it is, and will be, one of those defining filmic cultural moments. What will we do now when there isn’t a new LOTR movie to look forward to every year? Watch these DVDs, I suppose, and continuously marvel at a world that never ceases to amaze and enthrall.

I’m not giving full reviews for each movie: for one thing, I’m so far from objective I can’t even pretend to look at these movies on their own merits. (If I did, I’d probably give each movie grades ranging from 8-9. But given the emotional impact this set of movies has had on me, I’m giving them all perfect 10s.) There’s also no way I can capture everything I love and want to praise about each movie. But I do have some thoughts, however incoherent they might be…

Fellowship of the Ring
Understandably, it’s the most humourous and joy-filled of the three movies, since it’s an introduction to Middle Earth and Frodo Baggins (Elijah Wood) has yet to feel the real burden of the one ring. What a glorious world to step into: the green pleasantness of the Shire, the serene loveliness of Rivendell, the ethereal beauty of Lothlorien. This is the movie you’ll always remember because it’s the first one, and the one that first gave a hint of just how special this trilogy was going to be. From perfectly-matched effects shots, creating Hobbit and human in the same seamless frame, through to a lilting theme for the Hobbits, and a tour through two elven citadels, it’s a walk through Middle Earth unparalleled in splendour, and a complete joy to behold. That we get piles of heartfelt drama (the fight in the mines of Moria, or Gandalf holding his own against the Balrog, Sean Bean’s Boromir dying as heroically and uncheesily as you might hope) is only icing on an already bloody delicious cake. My favourite scene: when Gandalf tells Frodo that the really important thing is what we do with the time given to us.

The Two Towers
…is entirely about Andy Serkis and the amazing computer animation that went into the creation of pivotal good guy/baddie Smeagol/Gollum. When you see the very embarrassing suit Serkis had to wear, and the hoops through which he had to jump to create a character that he doesn’t even get to be onscreen, you have to admire the man’s dedication. His voice work is also phenomenal, at points whiny and child-like, at others menacing and on the knife-edge of insanity and terror. Of course, the animation is just flawless. Smeagol feels so much like a real character because he looks, moves and talks like one, and is so seamlessly a part of the goings-on that you forget after a while that he’s about 17 million pixels moving just so over Serkis’ performance. Howard Shore’s score hits another high note with his rousing, strings-drenched music for the Rohirrim. My favourite scene: Smeagol having a creepy but eventually triumphant conversation with his meanie alter-ego Gollum. Tense, deadly funny, amazingly effective.

The Return of the King
It’s gotten some flak for its five or six different endings, but I loved it. However much I am amused by the unmistakably homoerotic vibe between Frodo and Sam (come on, how in any universe is the line, “Don’t go where I can’t follow’ when you think the person you’re cradling in your arms is dead a platonic sentence??), and I must stress that the gayness was as present in Tolkien as it is in most of the Frodo/Sam scenes in the movie, I still get broken up at the end. Every time Sam insists that he can’t carry Frodo’s burden for him, but can carry him, or when Sam realises that Frodo will be leaving with the elves… it’s as heart-rending a friendship as has ever been portrayed onscreen. Having seen the extended version (which I shall treat as the definitive version of the film), I can see where Christopher Lee’s anger with the excising of his Saruman character comes from. It’s not that much screentime, substantially different from the book, and a key plot loose-end in the theatrical cut. With all the other scenes added back in, you get a fuller, more rounded movie that explains quite a few of the (in retrospect) odd cuts in the movie e.g., still going with the Saruman example: the jerky voice-overs and faraway shots couldn’t explain why Saruman’s palantir ended up in the murky water at the feet of Pippin (Billy Boyd). The extended scene does.

And, as expected, I didn’t touch on one millionth of what went on in those magical twelve hours. Sigh…

stars-10

Before Sunset (2004)

beforesunset

How often do you get a second chance with the one that got away? That’s the question Before Sunset tries to answer in reuniting Ethan Hawke’s Jesse and Julie Delpy’s Celine some nine years after they met on a train to Vienna. We got to witness the blossoming of first love in Before Sunrise, as Jesse and Celine wander through Vienna, falling in love while they talk and talk and dig deeper into each other’s beliefs and ideas and dreams. Without exchanging phone numbers, they promise to meet in six months at a certain place, on a certain day. In this movie, we get to see who turned up, who didn’t, and what’s happened in these two characters’ lives in the intervening years.

Most importantly, we get to see two people who never had the chance to fall out of love, fall in love all over again. It’s an instantaneous process, it seems, almost something chemical about the way Jesse and Celine are just so plugged into each other that nine years might as well have been months, or weeks, or days. Yes, a whole lifetime and entire worlds slipped by in that time, and yet, there are some things that don’t change.

What’s pleasing to the viewer (or at least, this viewer) is that, at the heart of this unabashedly romantic movie, is its quiet sense of reality. No one quite gets the ending they want, and like Jesse says when introducing his autobiographical book based on their time together, how you read the ending depends very much on yourself: whether you’re an optimist, a cynic, a want-to-believer, you can devise the ending that you want. Some might say it’s an easy out – director/co-writer Richard Linklater doesn’t have to make a call about getting his couple together in the end. But, really, it’s about ending the movie when reality is about to set back in. It’s up to us to do the rest of the work.

The dialogue is as intriguingly, deceptively simple as that used in the prequel. Hawke and Delpy are delights in their roles, brewing up that same incredible chemistry that made students the world over and generations across wish for just that kind of unexpected, magical vacation romance. As the characters point out changes in each other, reveal truths and lash out in anger for all the things they might have missed (Jesse is stuck in a loveless marriage, Celine has embarked on a series of doomed relationships), Hawke and Delpy never let us forget the deep connection that was forged in the first movie.

You’d think that bottled lightning happens once in a lifetime, that you meet the love of your life once, and the moment it’s over, that’s it. Well, as a movie, Before Sunset makes very clear that love, and memories, are never really finished, and proves that a sequel can be every bit as magical and touching as its predecessor.

stars-08

Before Sunrise (1995)

beforesunrise

Before Sunrise is a simple, poetic distillation of the essence of romance. On a cross-Europe train ride, Jesse (Ethan Hawke) meets Celine (Julie Delpy), and as they talk and impulsively jump off the train together to walk around Vienna for a day, they discover a connection so startlingly deep and touching that they fall in love knowing that they must part in the morning.

The movie camera does little more than follow Jesse and Celine on their extended date through the beauty of Vienna by night–they talk about anything and everything: first loves, heartbreaks, men and women. They get on each other’s nerves, briefly, visit a cemetery full of unknown ghosts, and wrestle with their growing desire to meet each other again. It’s lovely to watch, considering how easily the film could have been boring and pretentious with its protagonists making pseudo-intellectual chatter throughout (as Hawke’s character wryly observes at one point). And yet, it’s surprisingly real and heartbreakingly sweet, including the people they meet along the way–such as the poetic bum or the kind-hearted bartender.

One of my favourite scenes would have to be when Celine initiates a phone conversation with her friend, played by Jesse. As they hold their hands to their faces, pretending to speak into telephones while facing each other across a table, they reveal first impressions and secret thoughts, and find out new things about each other. It’s sweet, yet real, and so… ordinary. But beautiful nonetheless. Hawke has a tiny moment when his character forgets, and his hand slips to cup his chin, entranced by Celine. But he quickly recovers himself and gets back on the phone… part of their charade, their little game of falling more in love with each step they take.

Before Sunrise is a small, elegant picture that says more with its tiny cast and budget than a lot of films these days. I’m much looking forward to its sequel.

stars-08